Ancestral reconstruction

Contents

Trait reconstruction

Ancestral reconstruction is widely used to infer the ecological, phenotypic, or biogeographic traits associated with ancestral nodes in a phylogenetic tree. Methods for ancestral reconstruction include parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference.

DNA and Protein reconstruction

Originally proposed by Pauling and Zuckerkandl in 1963[1] the reconstruction of ancient proteins and DNA sequences has only recently become a significant scientific endeavor. The developments of extensive genomic sequence databases in conjunction with advances in biotechnology and phylogenetic inference methods have made ancestral reconstruction cheap, fast, and scientifically practical.

Ancestral protein and DNA reconstruction allows for the recreation of protein and DNA evolution in the laboratory so that it can be studied directly[2]. With respect to proteins, this allows for the investigation of the evolution of present-day molecular structure and function. Additionally, ancestral protein reconstruction can lead to the discoveries of new biochemical functions that have been lost in modern proteins[3][4]. It also allows insights into the biology and ecology of extinct organisms[5]. Although the majority of ancestral reconstructions have dealt with proteins, it has also been used to test evolutionary mechanisms at the level of bacterial genomes[6] and primate gene sequences[7].

In summary, ancestral reconstruction allows for the study of evolutionary pathways, adaptive selection, and functional divergence of the evolutionary past. For a review of biological and computational techniques of ancestral reconstruction see Chang et al.[2]. For criticism of ancestral reconstruction computation methods see Williams P.D. et al.[8].

Genome reconstruction

At chromosomal level, ancestral reconstruction tries to restore the genome rearrangements happened during the evolution. Sometimes it's also called karyotype reconstruction. Chromosome painting is currently the main experimental technique. See refs. Wienberg et al. [9] and Froenicke et al. [10]. .

Recently, researchers have developed computational methods to reconstruct the ancestral karyotype by taking advantage of comparative genomics. See refs. Murphy et al. [11] and Ma et al. [12].

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Pauling L. and Zuckerkandl E. (1963). "Chemical paleogenetics, molecular restoration studies of extinct forms of life". Acta chemica Scandinavica 17 (89): 9–16. doi:10.3891/acta.chem.scand.17s-0009. 
  2. ^ a b Chang S.W.; Ugalde J.A.; Matz M.V. (2005). "Applications of Ancestral Protein Reconstruction in Understanding Protein Function: GFP-Like Proteins". Methods in Enzymology. Methods in Enzymology 395: 652–670. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95034-9. ISBN 9780121828004. PMID 15865989. 
  3. ^ Jermann T. M. et al. (1995). "Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the artiodactyl ribonuclease superfamily". Nature 374 (6517): 57–59. doi:10.1038/374057a0. PMID 7532788. 
  4. ^ Sadqi, Mourad; Eva de Alba, Raúl Pérez-Jiménez, Jose M. Sanchez-Ruiz ,Victor Muñoz (January 2009). "A designed protein as experimental model of primordial folding". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 (11): 4127–4132. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812108106. PMC 2647338. PMID 19240216. http://www.pnas.org/content/106/11/4127.long. 
  5. ^ Chang B.S. et al. (2002). "Recreating a functional ancestral archosaur visual pigment". Molecular Biology and Evolution 19 (9): 1483–1489. PMID 12200476. 
  6. ^ Zhang C. et al. (2003). "Genome Diversification in Phylogenetic Lineages I and II of Listeria monocytogenes: Identification of Segments Unique to Lineage II Populations". Journal of Bacteriology 185 (18): 5573–5584. doi:10.1128/JB.185.18.5573-5584.2003. PMC 193770. PMID 12949110. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=193770. 
  7. ^ Krishnan N.M. et al. (2004). "Ancestral sequence reconstruction in primate mitochondrial DNA: compositional bias and effect on functional inference". Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (10): 1871–1883. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh198. PMID 15229290. 
  8. ^ Williams P.D. et al. (2006). "Assessing the Accuracy of Ancestral Protein Reconstruction Methods". PLoS Computational Biology 2 (6): e69. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020069. PMC 1480538. PMID 16789817. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1480538. 
  9. ^ Wienberg, J. et al. (2004). "The evolution of eutherian chromosomes". Curr Opin Genet Dev 14 (6): 657–666. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2004.10.001. PMID 15531161. 
  10. ^ Froenicke, L. et al. (2006). "Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?". Genome Res 16 (3): 306–310. doi:10.1101/gr.3955206. PMC 1415215. PMID 16510895. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1415215. 
  11. ^ Murphy, W. J. et al. (2005). "Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps". Science 309 (5734): 613–617. doi:10.1126/science.1111387. PMID 16040707. 
  12. ^ Ma, J. et al. (2006). "Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome". Genome Res 16 (12): 1557–1565. doi:10.1101/gr.5383506. PMC 1665639. PMID 16983148. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1665639.